Aleshire & Wynder Files Amicus Letter to California Supreme Court to Support Review of Case Limiting Housing Options

A&W Files Amicus Letter to California Supreme Court to Support Review of Case Limiting Housing Options

December 19, 2025 - Norman A. Dupont, with assistance from Bill Wynder, Fred Galante and Shukan Patel, filed an amicus curiae letter to the California Supreme Court on behalf of seven cities. The letter was in support of a Petition for Review filed by the City of Redondo Beach and urged the Court to grant review of an October 2025 decision by the Second District Court of Appeal’s in New Commune DTLA LLC v. City of Redondo Beach, (Case No. B336042).

The amicus filing urges the State’s High Court to grant review of a controversial appellate decision that threatens local zoning powers across the state.

The intermediate appellate court recently held that "residential overlay" zones are insufficient to meet state housing requirements if the underlying base zoning still allows for non-residential development.

The filing emphasizes that the current legal landscape could leave cities vulnerable to litigation even after they have acted in good faith to meet state-mandated housing targets. This instability impacts everything from the issuance of certificates of occupancy to long-term zoning for future residential developments.

In addition to A&W, the California League of Cities, the California Association of Counties and the Independent Cities Association have filed a separate amicus letter supporting the request for review. 

On January 7, 2025, the California Supreme Court extended its time to consider the petition until Feb. 18, 2026.  


* Specific loan program availability and requirements may vary. Please get in touch with your mortgage advisor for more information.
This communication is not intended to be, and does not constitute, legal advice, and no attorney-client relationship is formed by reading it. Seek the advice of an attorney before acting or relying upon any information in this communication. Facts specific to your situation or future developments may affect subjects contained herein. This communication may be considered ATTORNEY ADVERTISING in some states.